"Scientific Proof"

 "Scientific Proof" is that which is repeatable, demonstrable and observable.

Period.

In other words, the complete absence of transitional forms, and the millions of years required to make evolution at all believable, are outside the realm of science.  And yet, they have insisted on calling it science (and even saying "science" when they mean "evolution").  Their position was logically untenable, no matter how loudly and authoritatively they insisted on it.  

When evolutionists finally realized that, they invented something called "historical science" as opposed to "operational science". Now they have a form of "science" that doesn't have to submit to experimentation and observation. Convenient, hmm?

    Consider this quote from Ken Ham's excellent book SIX DAYS: "Men on the moon, airplanes, and the Internet all fall under the category of operational science -- none of this has anything to do with historical science. Both evolutionists and creationists can practice good operational science..."

But that doesn't stop evolutionists from intentionally confusing the two, like this quote from Bill Nye: " And I say to the grownups (not "adults" LOL), if you want to deny evolution and live in a world that's completely inconsistent with everything we observe in the universe (bare-faced lie; he's referring to his presumptuous conclusions about those observations), that's fine, but don't make your kids do it because we need them (you sure do). We need scientifically literate voters and taxpayers for the future. WE need people that can -- we need engineers that can build stuff, solve problems."

Notice the bait and switch? It has inundated our culture. It's everywhere in the universities, public schools and especially the media.

But there's still no REAL scientific evidence for evolution.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WHY THE NEW "DUNE" REMAKE IS DANGEROUS

  I read, and loved, the Frank Herbert Novel DUNE about 40 years ago.  I also watched the two different movies (the second a miniseries) with mixed feelings.  But when I watched this latest version, alarm bells went off.        The main character's title in the book and the earlier versions was "Maud 'Dib".  I forget what it meant.  But while watching this latest version, I couldn't help but notice that it was changed to "Mahdi".        "Mahdi" has a meaning outside the "Dune" franchise.  It's the tile of the Muslim Messiah; the one who will exterminate those who refuse to convert to Islam.         Muslims have a right to promote their faith in this country, however much I oppose it.  But when an established story is CHANGED to accommodate them, it's time to take notice.   As for Islam itself, my usual response to their challenges is this:  Islam came along over 6...
Read more

Intro to my autbiography OUTSIDER

      Based on the reception of my other books, OUTSIDER will never be a bestseller.  In fact, I doubt it'll ever be finished.  That's probably why I feel constrained to put what I've written as an introduction (so far) here on the blog.        I will never know what it's like to be anybody but me.      I will never know what it's like to be part of an identified minority: ethnic, religious, national or linguistic.      But I know what it's like to be on the outside. I know what it's like to be automatically excluded because of who and what I am.      So, when people say to me, “You don't understand,” because I'm not a member of that group, I find it ironic.      They're right; I don't understand.      But there are things I do understand.      I understand what it's like to be told, “This doesn't concern you,” and then ...
Read more